tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38067964.post5985349090872983110..comments2024-01-11T10:25:57.007+00:00Comments on Labour of Gove: Tory Bogus Sleaze: Can Gordon Apologize and Belittle GuF Story?Chris Paulhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15679067503215414300noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38067964.post-59118561785539699702009-04-13T10:07:00.000+01:002009-04-13T10:07:00.000+01:00It's all a bit odd. Nothing in the Osborne story w...It's all a bit odd. Nothing in the Osborne story was not already in the NOTW in October - http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/article53313.ecePaul Halsallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01602075031268155220noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38067964.post-58009960763279601852009-04-13T09:30:00.000+01:002009-04-13T09:30:00.000+01:00I'd imagine that Iain has removed the comment. Fre...I'd imagine that Iain has removed the comment. Free speech and all. Perhaps my spoof Private Eye, RedRag, or Guido Fawkes for that matter prose was too rich?<BR/><BR/>Nadine Dorries MP has just been on doing her confused and word-twisted best to smear Tom Watson MP ... because he used to sit near McBride. And she suggests that as McBride takes proper work instructions direct from Gordon Brown that Gordon is in on this nonsense he has presumably done in his own time. And she even suggests that Brown has read gibberish and tuff on her so-called blog that has so offended him that he's called McPoison down on her. <BR/><BR/>Nadine Dorries is not only a long-time habitual liar, a hypocrite who was pro-choice in Hazel Grove and now look at her, and a greedy and self-serving individual, but she's also showing classic delusions of grandeur here. She thinks MPs should get £120,000 plus all manner of allowances. And she is yet to mention her employing her own daughter in a top-rank parliamentary job, more or less straight out of college when an internship would be more usual.<BR/><BR/>She's not going to sue anyone. She's being a muppet. Tory high ups should call her off. She is herself now deep into smear territory.<BR/><BR/>John Torode of the Spectator suggested on BBC News Channel (Saturday late paper review) that most of these nasty and otherwise stories were already circulating, Nadine herself stated that this story had been slander (i.e. when circulated by Tories in the tea room) and was therefore libel (when included in a sleazy email, not itself intended for publication, and apparently spiked from publication in any form). In this she revealed that the story was already doing the rounds.<BR/><BR/>So, is it true that this story about Nadine was already circulating as she implies, starting among Tories? And the same goes for all the other stories. <BR/><BR/>Perhaps John Torode or others could do us all a favour and explain which stories were already circulating?Chris Paulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15679067503215414300noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38067964.post-48256854179130802162009-04-13T07:20:00.000+01:002009-04-13T07:20:00.000+01:00Couldn't find this on Iain Dale's blog - where is ...Couldn't find this on Iain Dale's blog - where is it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com