Posts
Paul "No Bollocks" Rowen MP: Compare and Contrast
Well well well. As we posted this morning the version of Paul Rowen's Letter From Parliament at Rochdale Online included vile smears against both Rochdale Labour Party (associating them with my blog!) and Labour of Love (associating me with them! and smearing my personal blog).
It still does, despite my plaints to publisher Malcolm Journeaux, who one unkind commenter has called Malcolm Porn-O. As does the version on the site of the secretive Rochdale Lib Dems (694 words). I don't think the Rochdale Observer would publish the Dave "Hen" Hennigan codicil, not yet tested. And nor it turns out will "Putting Rowen First" (694, minus filthy smear).
This site is of course (a) funded from Paul Rowen MP's Parliamentary Communication Allowance; and (b) produced by* the very same Malcolm Journeaux's RO Web Solutions; and (c) shortlisted for "best bespoke website" in the, ahem, Rochdale Online online awards.
* As are ALL FOUR COMPETITORS in the category. Cosy cosy cosy.
INCIDENTALLY: Malcolm is yet to respond to my request that he edit Rowen's vile smears. As the gutless Paul Rowen has done in the version he has published himself!
Perhaps it's the power cut, arf arf.
4 comments:
Let's get this straight. So we the taxpayer pay for Rowen's website. The money goes to Malcolm Journeaux who in turn gives Rowen an award for best website!
You couldn't make this shit up.
Rochdale politics stinks
Rowen hasn't won this award just yet. He's one of four nominees in the "bespoke" category, all of whom had ROWS as their creator. Hopefully he'll NOT win. That would stink.
Malcolm Journeaux is no Larry Flynt.
Larry won his legal battles.
The Rochdale Hustler has a very poor battling average.
Does Malcolm Journeaux tell lies about his age or is it just a series of coincidences that the web contact he has for photographing young women has he repeatedly knocked 10 years off his age.
What teenager really wants to be photographed by some guy in his 50's? A bit creepy? Mucky photos from a dirty old man?
Late last year Malcolm Journeaux's MJX phototography web profile had him as a "39 year old" whippersnapper.
But as a Company Director he has to declare his date of birth- December 1958.
Unless of course he is actually a 40 year old making a mistaken/false declaration on official company documents.
When Malcolm was caught out massaging his ego on Wikipedia (attempting to list himself as a prominent Rochdale personality) the digital trail led back to a subscriber associated with the number 1958. Other web geeks claim that this public spirited Wikipedia contributor was actually Malcolm himself.
Bentleys and Bunny birds?
At 50 isn't he now too old to be having a mid life crisis?
Post a Comment