The Rambler blogged what amounts to a follow up (23 July) to my blogpost and comments about Nadine needing the expenses book thrown at her (19 July). The Rambler makes a request to IPSA that they provide the Mum-P with a replacement. With an amusing suggestion for the financing of this measure, in this age of austerity.
Carelessly allowing a tornado to whisk the 74 or 123 page guide and scheme booklets through a waiting window - as she describes. I think she threw it, don't you dear readers? I don't know mind. No proof. Apart from the physical sciences. But that's my opinion. Some of Nadine's sockies think different. They've put up a bit of a fight in comments. But not much.
Ms Nadine has been on her feet in the house quite a bit these last few days but has probably surpassed many of her very best efforts today with what might well be highly defamatory attacks on a named company and a named individual too. Clearly parliamentary privilege protects the ridiculous and I rather think untrue remarks in her ludicrous and torturous speech. But if they were uttered anywhere else? That would be different. Compare (04 February 2010, itself based on an earlier document) and Contrast (this afternoon in parliament).