Labour Leadership and Guardian Sophistry: Tell Me Nominations are Secret Please
There is a classic episode of Regency Blackadder called Dish and Dishonesty involving manipulation of a very rotten borough to save the Prince and spite Pitt the Younger, his tormentor. Baldrick MP is too stupid to vote for the Prince. In a desperate last throw of the dice, Baldrick is sent to the House of Lords and Blackadder is left with nothing but a catskin windcheater and a broken turnip.
Today's Guardian has been briefed that Gordon Brown is applying his great clunking fist to his own party.
Word is that GB has 217, firm refusals from 35, and 93 are yet to decide. Brown's people are starting to name names of the recalcitrant. 35+93 = almost enough for three more candidates but not quite.
Meacher is rated to have THREE and McDonnell FORTY. This last figure doesn't quite tally with the arithmetic. But anyway, contrary to his assurances that he wants a contest, Brown's people are hoping to claw back TEN of those.
Meanwhile elsewhere in the paper Blairite Martin Kettle bollocks Miliband for wimping out and claims New Labour is dead because of this wimpery.
LOL view of that twaddle:Really New Labour was mortally wounded long ago. In March 2003 in fact. Possibly even died then. But like a headless chicken has been continuing to rattle round the kitchen cabinet, no longer squawking perhaps, but covering lots of ground and frightening the horses. I'd say with this and Michael White's blog-for-Brown the Guardian's credibility as a judge of Labour politics is also in intensive care. Let's pray for some double-effect medication to make the end swift and painless.
Still elsewhere Blair thinks Tories are unelectable and a wall is being built. This is the length of Pi and presumably has a diameter of one mile: Baghdad's Sunni Ghetto is built.
Susan seems surprised by all this. My comment there:Just a thought ... why are the nominations of PLP members NOT a secret ballot. If they are then the 217 is slightly meaningless. If they aren't then please tell me why the Leadership Vote is actually the least democratic of any selection process in our party - and goodness knows there is plenty of competition for that accolade.
Most important decision. Least democratic protection and by the sounds of it the most opportunity for intimidation. Please tell me that nominations are secret.
GRAPHIC: Brownadder and Ballsdrick from Tory pornster Theo Spark.