Libdemologists: It Really Is a Two Horse Race

Just this once they're right: "It's a Two Horse race!

Meanwhile it looks like Iain has put his calendar forward a day instead of his clock back an hour. Here.
But Newsnight have run the Not the November 1 Election show already.

Should have put it forward two days! What little there is to be said, has been.

UPDATE: A furious Lib Dem spin doctor has been on saying: "How dare you say our candidates are 'chalk and chalk'? They are in fact 'cheese and cheese' if you please." Fair enough.

Shahid Malik MP: No Stranger to Heavy Handed Security

Jekyll and Hyde figure Shahid Malik (left) - Dulles airport desperado and government invited expert by turns - had a few clashes with heavy handed authority on his CV even before he became an MP reports Rupa Huq.

Iain Dale's Diary: All a Pathetic Yah Boo Hoax?

Iain Dale got a bit of a flea in his ear for appearing to suggest on tuesday that today would have been election day. Here. He also claimed that the Tory's ever so clever poster would be all over the regional newspapers and on poster vans and the like.

But has anyone seen an example in the wild? Or was this actually just (a) pathetic yah boo and (b) a hoax to boot? There is certainly no such advert in my regional evening paper.

I still think Dave-id's witty vision of a "one-legged Lithuanian lesbian" dance troupe having their Arts Council Grants cut would have been even more popular.

UPDATE: A 'letter from home' arrives, in young Dale's own hand-writing. Says he didn't get his days wrong. "Diddums" as He might say.

Aaaaaargh!: LOL Agrees with Prague Tory, Again

Dr Rupa Huq has a far ranging post, on the perils of Islamic-ness I suppose, right here. Much of it about an amusing (in a haram kind of way) post-Islamist spoof blog on Islamism translated into the day to day.

Most of the discussion however is about Rupa's introduction. This concerns Shahid Malik being searched at an airport (again) and his being shirty about that. The comments are divided.

And, what's this? Oh dear oh dear oh dear. For the second day in a row I find myself agreeing - in part - with the generally reliably wrong Prague Tory.

Yesterday I agreed with him over at Dale's. That MPs of all parties that voted against Communication Allowances should use them without accusations of hypocrisy. Repeal the law later if you want to. But in the meantime don't hobble yourself or punish your constituents by not using the money. That's what the ever-so-principled Dale suggests.

This time it is much more serious. But Prague Tory may be right on this too. I tend to think so. Shahid Malik seems to be throwing a bit of a "Don't you know who I am?" here. As if the feudal rules of the muffin queue in the mother of parliaments should extend to customs clearance. And as if our own practices in Britain - sponsored by his own government, and defended by Malik in previous roles - are so different from these he's experienced in the USA.

Saying "this sort of treatment isn't deserved by anyone" as Rupa does is one thing. Quite a respectable if somethingly flawed argument. Flawed particularly as I'm struggling to find any untoward treatment? Being searched at all? Bring treated roughly, or impolitely, or insulted, or delayed?

Being against any kind of profiling? Ditto, also has some respectable arguments. But saying "this shouldn't be happening to me, as I'm a minister"? Well that frankly is not a respectable argument.

There quickly follows:
"I'm a diplomat", "I'm a spy for the FBI", "I'm a millionaire", "I know that George Bush me", "American Express" and "I'm a VIP me".

And also:
"I said I'm a British minister you red neck thicko, not a Pakistani minister from a peasant background, or French or some other inferior species ... Don't you know who I am?" That special relationship deja vu. All over again. Remember that one?

Most of us that travel a fair bit have at least occasionally been searched at airports and the like. I know I have been. Though sadly not in the USA where the airport security I have seen has often been worse than woeful.

I did a long haul flight a few days after 11 September 2001 for example. Never have so many been searched so many times by so very many. Our plane was even diverted to an airport with extra security for TWO extra searches before the first major leg of the journey. That being done on an all off, all back on basis. Though even then some of the detail was hilariously, hysterically illogical. One for another day. But four or five bag searches and friskings on one journey.

But the major "indignity" came in Melbourne, Australia where airport security asked everyone whether they'd been in "non Metropolitan areas" i.e. not pavements. Those foolish enough to admit same had ALL our footwear, even the pavement only kind, sprayed in powerful agri chemicals.

Fortunately none of our socks were conspicuously holey that day or there might have been a diplomatic incident: "Justice for people who walk in fields within a fortnight before going to Oz!"

There may be an issue with profiling in the USA in this case. Though to be fair they also harrass and obstruct all kinds of groups ... like known peace activists and those crossing from Canada, especially Canucks, and so on.

But the argument: "I'm a minister", "I'm a diplomat", "I know George Bush/Tony Blair", "I'm rich as Croesus", "I'm on the square" etc well, please Shahid, these just don't wash and they shouldn't. Next you'll be wanting an exclusive billionaire's jet for all your trips, you flying lion you!

Prague Tory is thankfully back on form and utterly wrong about the "writetothem" study, in which Shahid Malik was not seen as an outstanding correspondent. This is known to be pretty much completely discredited as anecdotal, manipulable and seriously flawed by systemic failures.

Exclusive: And the Band Played Waltzing Matilda ...

Brenda: Well, that seemed to go quite well really, quite polite for a dictator, and he did not notice did he?
Jackie: Great idea Bren, I mean I thought it was bloody hilarious Bren Ma'am, can't keep this silly grin off my face
Kim: I'm hiding, because no-one at all knows who I am
Gordon: No Ma'am he simply did not have a clue! (Puts on Deep Voice) "I - am - your - father!" Ha ha ha.
Brenda: Hope some blogger doesn't mix up the timeline

And the band played ... what exactly?

You may be able to check on this BBC player or remind yourself at this YouTube clip or perhaps better still at this one. But I'd not go showing that nice King Abdullah this one in a hurry.

Flying Lion Unlimited: Rough Guide to Jetsetting

It's a dirty job but somebody's got to do it. And Unity is doing a cracking job of looking under rocks and uncovering the the steaming whiffiness of nefarious Tory jet setters. On top of all that he's caught yet another Tory failing to declare donations. Lobster Blogster caught one at it earlier today, albeit in a different jet. How many more will there be?

Perhaps every last error and omission will be explained. But we are still left with Tory politicians gadding about in a billionaire's plaything - living the lifestyle of the rich and famous - including for photo opps in Darfur. They are proudly buying into feel good carbon off setting schemes and suggesting that cries of "hypocrisy!" are bad form. "Sniping about the details". But where is their "conspicuous consumption and hidden donations" off setting scheme?

Thanks to a comment from Tim J I have found my way round PPERA. To speed up the familiarisation for others, the hotlinks from the index seem to suggest it's not all online, but you can go to the nearest hotlink then use the page by page navigation at the bottom to progress.

Evan's link to the Electoral Commission interpretation is also working. The example given of an overseas donor who has a factory in an MP's constituency covering the cost of a trip to their HQ is quite different to the Ashcroft model. Which I think falls outside the intended purpose of this concession.

I plan to write to the Electoral Commission for clarification and suggesting revisions. If I manage that I'll report back. Though it's a full two years since my last still unanswered question: viz "Does the EC analyse patterns of election expenses returns to help police "unusual" (crooked?) practices?"

Footing the bill for all sorts of travel unrelated to their own location seems to be taking the piss really. Not what was intended. Tory "chancer" behaviour. Ashcroft/Flying Lion is giving campaign cash for Conservative-aggrandisement, the true costs are hugely disproportionate, and for my money - as they are not sponsoring trips to their own operations - they should not really be considered a permissable donor.

Nu Tories: Graphing All the Way to the Bank?

Conservative Home has an analysis (with pictures) of how Tory members are seeing things down the ages. Something like that.

Apparently SMUG is back. And utterly SMUG is the new SMUG. Excellent. Old School Policies are doing the trick. And having GOO lying like he means it are all popular with Darby, Joan, Tim and Nadine.

Meanwhile the same rank and file are 77% obsessed with Europe's perfidy.

LAUGHING GRAPHING NOTES: All images snatched from the M Saatchi waste bin at CH. And just in case you haven't noticed the 21 month crash is given the same space on the axis as the one month burn. Libdemtastic!

Dave-id: It's the Way You Tell 'Em Me Old China

Thank goodness Dave-id Cameron assured us early doors that he's a liberal conservative (though Wikipedia did think they spotted him reneging almost immediately), otherwise we would be very anxious indeed that he was in fact a uptight, jingoistic, disableist, homophobic, misogynist old school born-to-rule Tory Toff. Phew! Thanks to Sadie for that one, shining brightly among a cluster of bright twinklers. Mad Dorries and Toy Boy Tim! Are you sure?

UPDATE 16:11: Timbo has his boy Sam running round issuing categorical denials on the latter story. But DC's hilarious "one-legged lithuanian lesbian" arts council funding joke still stands. On its head probably.

Gerald Kaufman: Pursuing Justice for Yasmin Zalzala

Gerald Kaufman is pursuing Harriet Harman over Yasmin Zalzala Gate (various posts) in which she was dumped as Lib Dem candidate with party officers apparently deciding this on the basis of race, religion and gender.

Though these appalling Lib Dems said it was because of Yasmin's lack of collegial working. Well, yeah! Of course you will be really happy to work with unprincipled fools who are openly racist, sexist and religionist.

"Curly" is the only MP I know who pursues routine correspondence in this way. Generally the answer is that a reply has now been sent. So it works. Though it's not cheap.

Air Con: Do PPERA Schedule 7 Parts 5-7 Apply?

Evan Price, a Tory and a barrister who blogs his thoughts here, has kindly pointed me at Schedule 7 of PPERA which he says is the relevant one outside election periods. When it comes to "Value of Donations" this is not greatly different from the Schedule extract I published in my last post.

In Part I, 5 it appears to more or less repeat paras (1) to (5) of that extract. There is no para (6) which appeared to be like a mini Exec Summary reiterating the open market value point. In Part II, 6 and 7 it appears to underline the requirement for a donor to have permissible donor status, and to describe types of travel financing which constitute controlled donations.

Just now I cannot see anything here that (a) allows donations from offshore companies or (b) says travel donations needn't be declared at true market value.

At the time of writing I have not been able to get at the Electoral Commission guidance which Evan also pointed me at as the link was broken. Such guidance is of course only a quick gloss not chapter and verse anyway ...

Full Market Value: Claw Back from Con Air Tories?

The Electoral Commission website is hard work, but it does have this summary of what PPERA says on 'notional expenditure', that is where permissible donors provide premises, good and services at less than the full cost:

The PPERA specifies that 'notional expenditure' must also be treated as campaign expenditure (Legislation and Donations). Notional expenditure is incurred when a party receives benefits in kind, i.e. when someone else bears the costs that a party would otherwise have been liable for; for example, a party supporter might pay half the costs towards a party's advertising campaign. The amount paid by the supporter would be treated as notional expenditure and would be counted as campaign expenditure incurred by the party.

The nitty gritty of how such expenditures should be valued appears to be in section 53 of PPERA which I cannot find online just now. But the following is section 5 of schedule 16 of PPERA and has the title I'm looking for at least. Looks like it has the answers too. The emphasis in bold is mine:

Value of donations

5(1)The value of any donation falling within paragraph 2(1)(a) above (other than money) shall be taken to be the market value of the property in question.
(2)Where, however, paragraph 2(1)(a) above applies by virtue of paragraph 2(2) above, the value of the donation shall be taken to be the difference between—
(a)the value of the money, or the market value of the property, in question, and
(b)the total value in monetary terms of the consideration provided by or on behalf of the candidate or his election agent.
(3)The value of any donation falling within paragraph 2(1)(b) above shall be taken to be the value of the money, or (as the case may be) the market value of the property, transferred as mentioned in paragraph 3(1) above; and accordingly any value in monetary terms of any benefit conferred on the person providing the sponsorship in question shall be disregarded.
(4)The value of any donation falling within paragraph 2(1)(d) or (e) above shall be taken to be the amount representing the difference between—
(a)the total value in monetary terms of the consideration that would have had to be provided by or on behalf of the candidate or his election agent in respect of the loan or the provision of the property, services or facilities if—
(i)the loan had been made, or
(ii)the property, services or facilities had been provided,
on commercial terms, and
(b)the total value in monetary terms of the consideration (if any) actually so provided by or on behalf of the candidate or his election agent.
(5)Where a donation such as is mentioned in sub-paragraph (4) above confers an enduring benefit on the donee over a particular period, the value of the donation—
(a)shall be determined at the time when it is made, but
(b)shall be so determined by reference to the total benefit accruing to the donee over that period.
(6)In this paragraph “market value” in relation to any property, means the price which might reasonably be expected to be paid for the property on a sale in the open market.

Clearly, patently, I am no expert in these matters. But it does seem obvious to me that Ashcroft's donations of travel services in his jet are (a) not permissible as the company is offshore and this has not been travel on a trip to meet the donor; and (b) must be recorded in any case at FULL MARKET VALUE.

Again obviously, this is not the same as marginal cost or substitute or alternate cost. Full market value means "the price which might reasonably be expected to be paid for the property on a sale in the open market".

This is the amount that should have been recorded even if the donations had been from a permissible source and this is the amount which should now be clawed back from the Conservatives for each and every non permissible donation of air travel from Flying Lion. Not the pootling amounts actually recorded.

Presumably the same kind of Market Value assessment is required also in the register of members interests? Let's throw the book at the Tories for this, and at Ashcroft and Flying Lion in so far as they knew about this under reporting.

UPDATE: Dizzy is still spewing flames from his tale in a dark death spiral in comments here. Is anyone saying that the donor's actual cost of aviation fuel and wages and airport dues must be declared? These are just the tip of the iceberg running one of these things anyway. I'm certainly not saying that. The actual test as specified above is the open market value for the service actually received.

Let me provide a practical example for hard of thinking Tories everywhere. If someone buys the Conservatives 100 proper luxury commercial poster sites for political material and they are used for dog whistles and disgraceful lies and then it comes to registering the donation you cannot say:

"But we could have done this with flyposting/fliers/word of mouth/freesheet ads/pirate hoardings for one tenth of this cost so we'll register that amount instead".

Prize Devon Fudge: Buff Huhne is NOT a Unilateralist

Luke Akehurst suggests that Buff Huhne joined the SDP rather than sticking with Labour a lifetime ago because they were nuclear warheads. Therefore, suggests Luke, Mr Huhne may be a Libdemologist that is also an opportunist. Fancy that!

Then again he may not actually be a unilateralist at all. I'm certain he isn't. Huhne has not ruled out a different deterrent under the next Huhne government.

In fact on BBC News 24 in the early hours of 28 October 2007 this commenter caught Huhne calling for a continued deterrent, simply not launched from Trident submarines. The Observer published him at the same time calling for a "minimal deterrent" largely on cost grounds rather than principle.

Trident is famously awesomely expensive after all - far more so than other options. This is prize Devon fudge from this Lib Dem pretender. Hardly enough of a prize though to keep socialists and peaceniks in the Lib Dem tent. But enough perhaps to scare off the Tory horsies.

Tomas Abyu: Knocks Four Minutes Plus Off Marathon Best

You may remember Tomas Abyu of Salford Harriers and the amazing eyes-off-the-ball which saw his 4th place and fastest UK time for seven years in the Great North Run completely missed by the MSM who covered Steve Maclaren jogging round in two hours instead.

Today in Dublin Tomas knocked four and a half minutes off his lifetime best time for the marathon with two hours ten minutes and 37 seconds gun to tape. The race was won by Aleksey Sokolov who smashed the course record with 2:09:07. Tomas was second, 30 seconds clear of a pack of world class runners and running near even pace throughout. 31 minutes for each 10k plus 6:37 for the last 2k. Metronomic.

I have been expecting this sort of breakthrough for a couple of years now. Tomas has run 2:15 three times over the last couple of years and doing it in London in 2006 he was set for 2:11/2:12 for most of the race.

I now repeat my suggestion of four weeks ago:

Preselecting Tomas for the Beijing marathon now, subject to fitness, and giving him enough financial support to discourage the old four half marathons in 29 days (three in 15 days) routine of Spring this year would be a cracking idea.

In a Championship context - and the Dublin race was similar - 2:10 is a highly competitive time. Tomas was not taken to the last Commonwealth Games though third in the rankings with three places available. The authorities have told me that his lack of a formal coaching contract and his unwillingness to miss races for squad talking shops has counted against him. That is frankly ridiculous.

He had a poor run in the European in Gothenburg, carrying an injury. But it is quite obvious that he knows how to prepare himself to race at the very highest level. Perhaps I can introduce him to Dr Ron Hill MBE (best 2:09:28, 1970, world best) for a little fine tuning?

Well done Tomas. This was brilliant running.

UPDATE: I'm told this run may not count as an Olympic qualifying time as the race is not a member of a consortium called AIMS. That too is ridiculous.

Dizzy/Guido on Con Air: Extraordinary Renditions

Remember that Flying Lion homework set by Professor Watson, who never asks a question when he doesn't know the answer? Here is a summary.

It is not like me to link to a Tory blogger twice in one day. But Dizzy really should be embarrassed by this post as he joins Guido in rising to playground taunts by Bob Piper and coming out to play.

As Bob Piper says Dizzy is a "fearless investigator of dodgy dealings in public life". So why is this embarrassing? That's because he seems to have got so mixed up on this Flying Lion business.

Dizzy claims the rules in the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (PPERA) state that MPs can accept donations from overseas-based people or organisations if "the purpose of the donation is to pay for the travel costs".

This OF COURSE means that if George Bush summons you to Washington - as he famously didn't do to George Osborne - he can pay for the fares. And if Alisher Creosotemanov wanted Dave in Tashkent to see his Memory Man trick he also can legitimately finance that travel.

What it does not mean - as far as I can see - is that some rich overseas entity or individual can regularly pay for general gadding about. That would be just like giving cash and to do that compliance with rules is required. Flying Lion do not seem to comply with those rules on "permissible donors and lenders".

Dizzy also cites PPERA saying the travel costs registered are to be calculated based on commercial rates.

Strangely enough this DOES NOT mean some minimised marginal cost, or the rate that would be charged first class on a scheduled airliner. It means the market rate for or the actual full cost of the journey. The Conservatives do not seem to have complied with those rules.

In the case of Victor Papa - Bravo Mike Sierra the true cost is estimated to be about 30 to 40 times as great as that of scheduled first class. And that's 30 to 40 times what the Tories (those who have bothered to register the gifts) have declared.

The combination of Flying Lion being overseas registered and not allowed to make donations or loans under PPERA - except perhaps to visit Ashcroft in Bermuda, Bahamas or wherever he is lurking - and the true price being 30 times what has been knowingly under-declared these past three or four years ...

This means the Tories may face not only red faces and a proper sleaze scandal but also a fair old claw back.

Clearly the sorts of figures Guido admitted, of £20,000 so far and £50,000 these last two electoral years start to get more interesting when:

(a) they are grossed up 30 to 40 times to reflect the true commercial value (meaning up to £2.8 million for those 18 months alone);
(b) carelessly omitted flights are added to the roster; and
(c) the donations are exposed as both impermissable and consistently and knowingly under declared.

Hopi Sen: Hearing a Tory Dog Whistle a Mile Off

Here's Hopi Sen sifting through liberal conservative Cameron's "population" policy for an idea that's worth a candle. Strangely enough it doesn't look like there's any there.

Facebook: Are You Now or Have You Ever Been ... in the Bourgeois, Fuddy Duddy, Illiberal, Middle of the Road?

The Conservative Home EXCLUSIVE on BBC "Reds", picked up by the Mail has got to be one of best adverts yet for a proper training for bloggers and journalists in statistics, logic and semantic differentiation.

With a sample of well under 20% of the BBC's Facebookers (obviously a self-selecting sub-group of funseekers) both C-Home and Mail draw all sorts of generalistic conclusions. Here's the basic breakdown:

BBC - 10,580
BBC liberals - 1,340
BBC moderates - 340
BBC conservatives - 120

Given that the great leader Dave-id Cameron describes himself as a "liberal" and indeed positions his party as not only economically liberal but also socially liberal what does this all mean?

Nothing much actually. Small c conservative (rather like big C) is a word absolutely loaded with negative connotations, particularly for younger cohorts likely to play out on Facebook.

How many people are going to click next to a word like "conservative"?:

	Roget's New Millennium™ Thesaurus - Cite This Source - Share This
Main Entry:	conservative
Part of Speech:	adjective
Definition:	moderate
Synonyms:	bourgeois, cautious, constant, controlled, conventional, die-hard, fearful, firm, fogyish*, fuddy-duddy*, guarded, hard hat*, hidebound, holding to, illiberal, inflexible, middle-of-the-road*, not extreme, obstinate, old guard*, old-line, orthodox, quiet, red-neck, right, right-wing, sober, stable, steady, timid, traditional, traditionalistic, unchangeable, unchanging, uncreative, undaring, unimaginative, unprogressive, white bread*
Antonyms:	incautious, left-wing, liberal, progressive, radical, revolutionary

Main Entry:	conservative
Part of Speech:	noun
Definition:	moderate
Synonyms:	Tory*, bitter-ender*, classicist, conserver, conventionalist, die-hard, fossil, hard hat*, middle-of-the-roader*, moderate, moderatist, obstructionist, old fogy, old guard*, old liner*, preserver, reactionary, red-neck, right, right-winger, rightist, silk-stocking*, standpat, stick-in-the-mud*, traditionalist, unprogressive
Antonyms:	left-winger, liberal, radical

Now of course "liberal" can be seen as disparaging too - in political circles at least - but Thesaurus-wise it ain't bad at all:

Main Entry:	liberal
Part of Speech:	adjective 1
Definition:	progressive
Synonyms:	advanced, avant-garde, big, broad, broad-minded, catholic, detached, disinterested, dispassionate, enlightened, flexible, free, general, high-minded, humanistic, humanitarian, impartial, indulgent, inexact, interested, latitudinarian, left, lenient, libertarian, loose, magnanimous, not close, not literal, not strict, permissive, pink, radical, rational, reasonable, receiving, receptive, reformist, tolerant, unbiased, unbigoted, unconventional, understanding, unorthodox, unprejudiced
Antonyms:	conservative

Main Entry:	liberal
Part of Speech:	adjective 2
Definition:	giving
Synonyms:	Santa Claus, altruistic, beneficent, benevolent, big, bighearted*, bounteous, bountiful, casual, charitable, eleemosynary, exuberant, free, generous, good Joe, handsome, kind, lavish, loose, munificent, open-handed, open-hearted, philanthropic, prince, prodigal, profuse, soft touch, softie, unselfish, unsparing, unstinging
Antonyms:	strict

Main Entry:	liberal
Part of Speech:	adjective 3
Definition:	abundant
Synonyms:	ample, aplenty, bounteous, bountiful, copious, galore, generous, handsome, lavish, munificent, no end, plentiful, plenty, profuse, rich, stink with
Antonyms:	conservative
Source:	Roget's New Millennium™ Thesaurus, First Edition (v 1.3.1) Copyright © 2007 by Lexico Publishing Group, LLC. All rights reserved.

For the UK-wide Facebook population the liberal to conservative ratio is we're told just 2.5 to 1. Four times less liberal than those on the BBC network claim Conservative Home:

UK - 6,407,580
UK liberals - 545,240
UK moderates - 251,320
UK conservatives - 216,660

Narrowing it down to the London network where most BBC employees reside, the ratio is still just nigh of 3 to 1 at 147,340 to 51,760.

Labour of Love have discovered the following from this analysis:

1. In a forced choice and with the terms 'socialist' 'communist' 'neocon' 'fascist' and even 'libertarian' not available, never mind any creative combination of terms, such as 'liberal conservative' two to three times as many people in the broad population pick 'liberal' as 'conservative'.

2. In the same forced choice test one sample group of young media professionals showed themselves to be about 25% more likely to positively select one of these three key terms - liberal, moderate or conservative - and three times as likely to mark themselves as 'liberal'.

3. This result might well be replicated in other groups of young media professionals and very likely other groups where vocation and interest come ahead of money-grubbing in career choice. We don't know yet, Conservative Home did not test that.

Labour of Love speculate thusly:

4. Groups of city boys, accountants, salesmen, computer programmers etc etc may well show an opposite predeliction associating the term 'conservative' either with a political party or with caution, accumulation of wealth, selfishness etc.

5. While "Tory" is a good handle for Labour's main national opponents in England, and they don't like it, "Conservative" seems to be a pretty good dog whistle also.

6. The Conservative Party should continue to try their attempts to coin portmanteau expressions that take the sting out of this highly negative term but also seek alternatives such as "Christian Democrat", "National Party" even "Liberal Party" (cf John Howard). Sadly "Unionist Party" no longer rings true.

PHOTO CREDITS: Top from Conservative Home, Road sign from Jasper Fforde Ffan Club, who sadly omitted "Conservatively".

Claire Fibbity: "Let 'em Cry!" Expert is Charlatan

But is Claire Verity also a member of the Liberal Democrat Party? We don't know. We're only asking. Well she could be. Diabolical liberties have been taken.

Leaving aside her obvious political leanings Anorak "Tabloid news for broadsheet readers" do not dish the dirt quite as well as the original tabloid-broadsheet which has her in bed with Mick Jagger within 48 hours of taking the job of ignoring his kids.

"Let them cry!" she may have said sensitively as she seamlessly switched her speciality to geriatric urology.

For which she may have more qualifications than she does for child care.

Alexander the Grating: PLP Chair "I Know Nothing"

When I was collecting my "tread lightly" tube at B&Q yesterday I bumped into my MP Tony Lloyd with his family. After an exchange of witty pleasantries I asked him to name names on the Tory-sponsored Alexander the grating anecdote reported by Pendennis in the Observer. That is that after PMQs Tories were egged on by an unnamed Labourite, to keep them hammering the currently unpopular "election guru":

"Great attack by David Cameron. Make sure you keep up the pressure on that little git Alexander. We can't stand him."

Lloydy said he'd just read his copy but not noticed the story. He headed off briskly towards the fertilizer while I sought illumination elsewhere.

Dizzy Double Thinks: On the Saudi Dictatorship

I don't think Vincent Cable is proposing military action to topple the regime in Saudi. Apart from that Dizzy - blogging geekily hands free from the M25 - has a cracking analogy going with Iraq. He's certainly caught the two-faced Liberal Democrat curmudgeon out good and proper. Apart from that one thing.

No doubt Dizzy will apologise in person when they meet up at The Saudi Embassy - near Green Park tube - on Wednesday 31 October. From 18:00 - 20:00h. I don't see any neocons or Tories on the platform. Not sure if there are any Libdems. Possibly Peter Tatchell, or is he now Green again?

Facebook Group. And there's a John McDonnell EDM here.

Following Dizzy's blessing this motion can now expect a flood of signatures from freedom loving Tories?

Christie Hoax: Still John Leech Clings to Closure Fib

Manchester Labour activist John Hacking is rightly furious that Cllr John Leech MP will still not admit, never mind apologise for, hoaxing the people of Withington, as well as needlessly frightening thousands of patients from the region, by pretending the Christie Hospital was threatened with closure.

John provides an extended quote from the Manchester Evening News of 15 April 2005. Neil Goodwin, the CEO of the Strategic Health Authority, saying in effect, and I do paraphrase slightly: "These maverick Doctors (and John Leech) are talking 100% Absolute Bollocks". (Goodwin in fact said "stuff and nonsense").

Leech says the MEN report was his signal to campaign. LOL believe it is likely that Leechy's scaremongering leaflets were not only already designed, and already printed, but that they were also already terrorising local people with it.

The MEN report is plagued with factual errors, for example claiming that "60 doctors have signed a petition" when NONE HAD IN FACT DONE SO, but on balance it gives the lie to Leech's scaremongering story.

Still Leech will not concede publicly what we all know. Still he will not acknowledge he was wrong to use cancer patients as a political football. Still he will not apologise for what is either gross dishonesty or gross incompetence.

Leech's behaviour on this matter was absolutely outrageous. No amount of crawling round Doctors and medical charities worthy though that appears, and certainly not issuing of "biggest ever" but bogus "health surveys" will absolve him. Leech actually had the gall to tell patients waiting for chemo- and radio- therapy that their lifeline was likely to shut.

And now he preaches in Council about morality?

His selection rival Yasmin Zalzala PhD - who had fought the seat well in 1997 and 2001 but was rejected as unsuitable amidst claims that as a woman and an Iraqi refugee and a muslim she could never win - had a cracking riposte in the South Manchester Reporter Letters this week. "Where are these 60 Doctors that you keep talking about?" she asks of Cllr Leech's repeated excuses for his cock and bull closure story.

CHRISTIE FACTS: Only THREE of these "sixty" Doctors have EVER been named in this hoax. Dr Nick Slevin, Dr Mark Saunders and Sarah O'Dwyer. In ascending order of hysteria. Slevin spoke of concern being communicated to him, Saunders of patients' suffering, O'Dwyer of patients' deaths.

CHRISTIE FACTS: Freedom of Information searches revealed that NO DOCTORS AT ALL signed and submitted the supposed "petition" which was in fact in the form of a draft letter of protest to be signed individually.

CHRISTIE FACTS: That draft letter DID NOT - unlike Lib Dem literature - claim that Christie Hospital could or would be closed.

CHRISTIE FACTS: One LIB DEM leaflet - full of unsupportable claims of a closure threat - was absolutely shamelessly distributed to Chemo- and Radio- therapy patients and to nursing and ancillary workers.

LOL believe that this was at least FOUR DAYS before, not after the MEN story broke as Leech now claims. We'll be checking diaries and interviewing witnesses in an attempt to prove that to be the case.